Say your answer out loud first, then jot down the key points you made. Writing it helps you spot gaps — and it's what the AI feedback reads.
0 words
Knowledge of Gillick competence and the Fraser guidelines, confidentiality for young people, and safeguarding awareness.
A structure to build your own answer on — not a script.
Identify
Her autonomy and confidentiality versus parental involvement and safeguarding.
Competence
Assess Gillick competence: does she understand the advice, risks and alternatives? Apply the Fraser guidelines for contraception.
Encourage, don't force
Encourage her to involve a parent or trusted adult, but respect her wish if she refuses and meets the criteria.
Safeguarding
Explore the relationship sensitively: age gap, coercion, exploitation. Under-13s cannot legally consent; a significant age gap or coercion requires safeguarding action.
Holistic care
Sexual health advice, STI protection (condoms), emotional wellbeing, follow-up.
Conclude
If competent, Fraser criteria met and no safeguarding concerns: prescribe and maintain confidentiality, while keeping the door open to involving parents.
A strong but not perfect answer. Read the notes to see why it works — then make your own version with your experiences.
The tension here is between respecting a young person's confidentiality and autonomy, and the natural instinct to involve her parents and protect her.
The starting point is that young people under 16 can consent to their own treatment if they're Gillick competent1 — they understand what's proposed, including the risks and alternatives. For contraception specifically, the Fraser guidelines apply2: she understands the advice, she can't be persuaded to tell her parents, she's likely to have sex anyway, her health may suffer without contraception, and it's in her best interests.
The GP should encourage her to talk to a parent or another trusted adult, because support at home is valuable. But if she refuses and she's competent, the GP should respect that. If young people think their GP will tell their parents, they may simply stop seeking help3 — which is riskier.
At the same time, the GP needs to think about safeguarding. She should gently explore the relationship — whether it's consensual, whether there's any pressure, how old he really is. A 16-year-old boyfriend is a small age gap, but if there were signs of coercion or exploitation4, or a much older partner, the GP would have to act to protect her, even if that meant sharing information with safeguarding services.
She should also discuss condoms to protect against infections, and offer follow-up.
So if she's competent, meets the Fraser criteria and there are no safeguarding concerns, I think the GP should prescribe the pill and keep her confidence — while leaving the door open to involving her parents later.
Real interviews are won and lost here. Answer each one aloud.